Showing posts with label Elective Dictatorship. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Elective Dictatorship. Show all posts

Saturday, 25 September 2021

Internal Market Bill and how Parliament works

A FIGHT WITH THE EU ... LORDS ... TORY BACKBENCHERS ... AND THE DEVOLVED NATIONS

The Herald (a Scottish broadsheet) pulled no punches in its report

Likewise their cartoonist depicted how Johnson had seemed under siege from outraged Tory backbenchers


From January, the UK government wants to continue to have a joint market across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland - the "internal market".

Instead of the rules and regulations around things like food and air quality and animal welfare being set in Brussels, now they have to be set closer to home - and there is a row over who should have the final say.

Many powers are set to be directly controlled by the Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish administrations, in fields including food labelling, energy efficiency and support for farmers.

However, the UK government has said the devolved administrations will still have to accept goods and services from all other parts of the UK - even if they have set different standards locally. (source: BBC, Dec 2020)
The Internal Market Act 2020 is one of the most controversial bills to ever successfully pass through the UK parliament.
It was widely characterised as breaking international law bu contradicting and breaking parts of the Brexit deal, an international treaty. 
There was much media speculation about a backbench rebellion, and frontbench resignations ... but in the event Johnson and his whips got their way: 328 of 363 Tory MPs voted with the government, as did the DUP, with just 2 Tories voting against.
The saga exposed flaws in the UK parliamentary system...

ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP? GOVERNMENT BACKBENCHERS THE DE FACTO OPPOSITION?

Labour leader Keir Starmer was criticised for failing to whip up significant public pressure on the government. In the event, any hopes of a government lay with the prospect of a backbench rebellion, which simply didn't transpire. Of 35 Tory MPs who refused to vote with the government, only 2 actually voted against. The whip system triumphed: most Tory MPs who held principled opposition to the bill failed to vote against, fearing for their seats (Johnson had shown he could be ruthless after succeeding May, forcing out all Tory MPs who voted against his Brexit bill) and/or for their hopes of becoming a government minister whenever Johnson eventually held a cabinet reshuffle.

ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP? WHAT ABOUT THE DEVOLVED NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS?

While the Northern Irish response was predictably split on nationalist/unionist lines, the Welsh and Scottish governments were clear in their opposition - but the UK government refused to consult or seek authority from either. The Welsh government took the case to the High Court of Justice, but lost. The Scottish Parliament voted on whether to authorise the bill's contents ... and voted against, formally denying the UK government permission to carry this out, but this had no impact on the bill passing into UK law.

As the BBC article quoted above indicates, this is a story about how powers once based in Brussels are redistributed back within the UK:
The Scottish government says a Westminster "power grab" is under way, because any responsibility which is not specifically reserved should automatically come to Holyrood.

But the UK government says what is happening in January represents "the biggest transfer of powers in the history of devolution".

ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP? WHAT ABOUT THE HOUSE OF LORDS? plus...Biden pressure

The Lords repeatedly refused to back the bill, voting against and attaching amendments. The Commons used their power to ignore the Lords vote.
Above: a Daily Mail report 9th Nov 2020 (this saga went on for months!) also highlights the direct pressure from the incoming US president, who bluntly and undiplomatically warned that any breach of international law - especially that around the GFA - would ensure the UK would fail in efforts to win a trade deal with the USA. The EU would also threaten legal action (see Daily Mail video)

ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP? WHAT ABOUT THE FREE PRESS?

TV news reportage did give space to a series of prominent critics, including multiple past Tory Attorney Generals (they have responsibility for ensuring government actions are compliant with laws), but the press largely reflected the right-/left-wing split. That means that the government largely escaped criticism from the Times and Telegraph (broadsheets) or the Mail, Express, Sun or Star (tabloids), facing criticism mainly from the low-circulation Guardian and Mirror only.
Indeed, the UK nationals ignored the huge story of the crucial vote on 29th September 2020, focusing instead on another potential government rebellion over covid restrictions (see Paperboy) - only the Scottish press led on the story.

READ MORE...

Executive backs down from confrontation with Lords (Dec 16, 2020, Guardian)
The Wiki.
BBC overview.
There are lots of news clips on this (YouTube), such as...


...

Friday, 13 December 2019

VOTING SYSTEMS First Past the Post

It was a right-wing Tory, attacking a 1970s Labour government, who came up with this phrase, a great starting point when considering the flaws in FPTP, a system used in very, very few democracies - and not even for the many other UK non-general elections.

THE ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP

Lord Hailsham was condemning how a party with a Commons majority could essentially rule free if any effective opposition.

The Tories didn't win over 50% of votes in 2019. There is a clear anti-Brexit majority from the election vote. Yet they have a massive Commons majority, so the only way they'll face any effective opposition will not be in parliament (though the Lords might pose some temporary barriers for them to simply knock down).

Instead, the Supreme Court is one of three avenues of potential opposition or limits on their decision-making. The majority of UK citizens will not have any effective voice in their parliament for the next five years. Scottish voters have already, 1 day after the election, been warned that their overwhelming pro-independence SNP vote is meaningless. They will not get the second independence referendum they have democratically mandated the SNP to pursue. They will not get a second Brexit referendum either despite the huge pro-remain majority. They instead will be dictated by English MPs.

Unless the Supreme Court rules that an independence referendum must be held because of the terms of the Act of Union and the amendments that set up devolved government.

The 1980s saw Scotland erupt in fury at a similar situation. They overwhelmingly elected Labour MPs, but were ruled by an extreme right-wing Tory government under Thatcher. When she imposed the poll tax, a rather unsubtle attack on the poor, there was immediate civil unrest. The street protests were so huge and prolonged that it would be a key factor in the Tories kicking her out and replacing her with the moderate John Major, who quickly scrapped the poll tax. I predict Scotland will see scenes like those in Barcelona/Catalonia, mass protests over the denial of an independence vote.

The third avenue of limits on a government with no meaningful opposition within parliament comes from international relations. Corbyn revealed the secret negotiations over the NHS with the US. Various Tories have been giving speeches for years on how Brexit gives Britain the chance to become an ultra-low corporate tax centre - a tax haven. I predict the EU will get tough with the UK on post-Brexit trading rules. And the USA will trample over British business and public sector in any negotiated deal given the huge difference in power.

2019 ELECTION - THE NUMBERS


Green MPs elected in yesterday’s general election represented more than 850,000 votes while SNP MPs represented under 26,000, according to figures from the Electoral Reform Society.

More than 330,000 votes were needed to elect a Liberal Democrat, compared to 50,000 for Labour and 38,000 for Plaid Cymru and Conservative candidates.

Meanwhile, the Brexit Party won more than 642,000 votes but failed to get any representatives in the House of Commons.

Overall, the Electoral Reform Society claims that 45.3% of votes did not get any representation, because of the number of voters who didn’t support the winning candidate.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2019/dec/12/general-election-2019-uk-live-labour-tories-corbyn-boris-johnson-results-exit-poll

See https://mobile.twitter.com/electoralreform/status/1205435581402099713?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fd-34556447883617819625.ampproject.net%2F1912120230490%2Fframe.html